In a move that has stirred considerable debate within the technology and creative sectors, UK ministers have announced a delay of at least a year in the introduction of a comprehensive AI regulation bill. The delay is primarily attributed to the government’s desire to include detailed copyright rules within the legislation, a move that has met with both industry support and opposition.
Peter Kyle, the UK’s technology secretary, stated that the government intends to roll out a ‘comprehensive’ AI bill during the next parliamentary session, which is unlikely to occur before the upcoming king’s speech—potentially set for May 2026. We feel we can use that vehicle to find a solution on copyright,
a government source explained, highlighting ongoing consultations with creators and tech companies to develop effective copyright regulations for AI.
This development follows a significant delay from the Labour government’s original plan to introduce a targeted bill focused on large language models like ChatGPT. That earlier legislation would have mandated companies to submit their models for testing to ensure safety, reflecting concerns that advanced AI could pose threats to humanity.
Recent political maneuvering has seen ministers choose to align with US policies to avoid weakening the UK’s attractiveness to AI firms. As a result, the delayed legislation aims to address industry needs without compromising the country’s competitive edge. Nevertheless, the delay raises concerns among stakeholders about the pace of regulation, which many see as crucial for AI safety and copyright enforcement.
In a parallel legislative effort, the government is involved in a dispute with the House of Lords over copyright rules in a separate data bill. This bill proposes that AI companies can train their models using copyrighted materials unless rights holders opt out—a move that has faced fierce backlash from artists and creative industry representatives, including Elton John and Paul McCartney.
While the government insists that the data bill is not the appropriate vehicle for copyright issues, it has promised to publish an economic impact assessment and technical reports to further address these concerns. Meanwhile, some Peers have backed proposals requiring transparency from AI companies about their use of copyrighted data, creating a complex regulatory environment.
Industry voices and experts emphasize the importance of balanced regulation. Beeban Kidron, a campaigner for the creative sector, criticized the government’s approach, describing it as ‘shafting the creative industries’ and risking the decimation of a major industry sector. Conversely, organizations like the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees stress that AI should be used responsibly, safeguarding workers’ rights in the process.
Most of the UK public also supports strong oversight, with a recent survey indicating that 88% believe the government should have the authority to halt AI products if deemed dangerous. Over 75% favor government or regulator oversight over private companies alone.
As discussions surrounding AI regulation continue, experts and industry leaders remain watchful of how these legal frameworks will evolve. The upcoming legislative session and the next king’s speech in 2026 are anticipated to be pivotal moments in shaping the future of AI governance in the UK.
