Please consider supporting us by disabling your content blocker.
loader

Tech Bosses Preach Patience as They Spend and Spend on A.I.

Mark Zuckerberg in a gray T-shirt on a stage in front of a seated audience, with a camera above him and images projected behind him.

Big technology companies show no signs of slowing their spending on artificial intelligence, even though a payoff still looks a long way away.

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, started 2023 by declaring it the “year of efficiency.” Like several of its big tech peers, Meta cut jobs and mothballed expansion plans. Then came A.I.

Mr. Zuckerberg started this year saying his company would spend more than $30 billion in 2024 on new tech infrastructure. In April, he raised that to $35 billion. On Wednesday, he increased it to at least $37 billion. And he said Meta would spend even more next year.

He stated, “I’d rather build too fast rather than too late,” emphasizing the importance of not letting competitors gain a significant lead in the A.I. race.

The tech industry’s biggest companies have made it clear over the last week that they have no intention of throttling their stunning levels of spending on artificial intelligence, even though investors are getting worried that a big payoff is further down the line than once thought.

In the last quarter alone, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Google’s parent company Alphabet spent a combined $59 billion on capital expenses, 63 percent more than a year earlier and 161 percent more than four years ago. A large part of that was funneled into building data centers and packing them with new computer systems to build artificial intelligence. Only Apple has not dramatically increased spending because it does not build the most advanced A.I. systems itself.

As we look at these trends, one might wonder: What does this mean for the future of technology? Will these investments pay off? Only time will tell, but the commitment from these tech giants suggests a belief in the transformative potential of A.I.

For further details, you can read the full article on The New York Times.